Growth parameters for Cepola macrophthalma
 
Maximum Length 80cm TL
n = 5
Note that studies where Loo is very different (+/- 1/3) from Lmax are doubtful.
Lm vs Linf graph [n = 2]
Reproductive graph [n = 2]
M vs K graph [n = 3]
M vs Linf graph [n = 3]
Longevity vs 3/K graph [n = 3]
ø = 2.99
L inf = 67.6 cm TL
K = 0.2
Median record no. 3
4678Ref. 4678
Loo
(cm)
Length Type K
(1/y)
t0
(years)
Sex M
(1/y)
Temp° C Lm Ø' Country Locality Questionable Captive
42.5 TL 0.379 -0.10 1.02 15.5 20.0 2.84 Greece South Evvoikos Gulf No No
60.9 TL 0.375 0.53 3.14 Greece North Euboikos, 1986-88 No No
67.6 TL 0.214 0.00 0.68 15.5 23.8 2.99 Greece North Evvoikos and Pagassitikos Gulfs No No
78.5 TL 0.170 0.10 F 14.0 3.02 Turkey Izmir Bay No No
83.2 TL 0.160 0.09 M 14.0 3.04 Turkey Izmir Bay No No
Search for more references: Scirus
Back to Search
Add New Record
Back to Top

Publish in our journal partners Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria (Impact factor 2023: 1.17; link to old content 1970-2020), Journal of Applied Ichthyology (Impact factor 2022: 1.222) and Journal of Fish Biology (2.0, 2022 impact factor) the results of your primary research on fish growth, weight-length relationships, reproduction (maturity, fecundity, spawning), food and diet composition, introductions and range extensions for faster subsequent entry in FishBase.

cfm script by eagbayani, 05.04.99 ,  php script by elaxamana, 11/02/09 ,  last modified by sortiz, 06/03/17